My colleagues Pamela Duncan and Tobi Thomas from the Guardian’s data unit report discrepancies in today’s GCSE results:
A rising tide lifts all boats and this year’s algorithm-to-teacher-graded-U-turn has resulted in an increase in top grades across every subject. However, some subjects’ boats were lifted higher than others.
Of those subjects with 50,000 or more candidates, science students fared best this year. More than half of biology students (54%) enjoyed one of the top three grades in 2020, up from 43.3% in 2019, with similar changes in chemistry (up from 44.1 to 53.5%) and physics (up from 44% to 53.2%).
Three quarters of classics candidates achieved the top grade of 7 and above, compared to 64.5% of candidates in 2019.
As mentioned earlier, engineering students enjoyed the biggest bump in grades between 2019 and 2020: 2.3 times as many engineering students got a grade of 7 and above this year (11.4% in 2019 versus 26.5% in 2020).
There were also significant lifts in physical education, computing, drama and business studies.
Citizenship studies had the lowest share of the top grades awarded this year, with just over a fifth (22.3%) of students achieving the top grade of 7 and above. Nonetheless, this was still an increase in comparison to 2019 results in which just 16.6% of candidates received one of the three top grades.
After all the uncertainty of the exams fiasco, head teachers across the country are celebrating their pupils’ GCSE success, but they say recent experiences have damaged relations with the Department for Education (DfE).
Jules White, head teacher of Tanbridge House secondary school in Horsham, West Sussex and leader of the Worth Less? education funding campaign, was with pupils this morning, watching with delight as they found out their grades.
“We had a wonderful year group. They didn’t want to go into lockdown back in March. We should be celebrating their success today, and if they’ve had a little bit of a boost, then great. Just looking at them now, they’re really pleased. That’s what we are in it for.It’s not just about exams, it’s about young people taking the next step.”
White was highly critical of DfE leadership. “A shambolic few days has cruelly exposed the absence of effective leadership at the DfE. Long held concerns about the department’s inability to listen meaningfully to head teachers and then act decisively and with flexibility is the main learning point from this disaster.”
He said schools faced huge future issues, including full reopening of schools in two weeks time, the threat of localised lockdowns and grappling with vast amounts of curriculum content ahead of next year’s exams with so much time already lost.
“Confidence amongst heads regarding the DfE’s ability to lead us with credibility is extremely low.”
That’s all from me for today. Thanks for reading and commenting this morning. You’ll be in the hands of my colleague Helen Pidd, who’ll be joining you for much of the rest of the day.
The GCSE results are in and a first look at the data (which came to us very late) appears to show that this year’s results chaos has benefited students whose grades have risen overall.
A government/Ofqual U-turn earlier this week saw results reached by an algorithm being replaced by those issued by teachers.
The proportion of students achieving one of the three highest marks – grades 7 and above – reached 27.6%; 5.7 percentage points higher than the 2019 exam cycle.
Updated
A company run by long–term associates of Michael Gove and Dominic Cummings has been working behind the scenes with the exams agency Ofqual on its disastrous strategy for determining A-level results, the Guardian can reveal.
Public First, a policy and research firm owned by James Frayne and Rachel Wolf, who both formerly worked for Gove, has been involved on the project with Ofqual since June after being granted a contract that was not put out to competitive tender.
Details of the contract have not been made public and Ofqual declined to say how much public money had been spent hiring Public First.